Reports:
Mandy:
1. What was your role in this investigation? (Please check one)
Sensitive/Psy
2. What equipment did you use on this investigation?
Thermometer
Video camera
3. What phenomena did you experience on this investigation? (Please check all that apply)
Temperature related phenomena (hot or cold spots)
Sensation of energy
Sensation of being watched
Odd behavior of equipment
Battery drainage or power outage
Electrical phenomena (lights, equipment acting up)
Hearing/auditory
Empathic information, such as headaches and chest pain.
4. In review of the footage, recording, or photographs taken at the location, which of the following did you find? (Please check all that apply)
Other (please specify below)
Camera with auto-focus auto-focusing on nothing, but as if someone was standing in close range to the viewfinder.
5. What technical observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Mandy: Temperature spikes and drops, in conjunction with EMF spikes and Olivus words.
6. What sensitive observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Mandy: Received information about a "Br" name, as well an image of a man with a beard. Heard the name "Roger" and did not want to enter the little girl's room. Had overwhelming feeling of possession and aggression to us being in there. Felt confusion as well, like the entity didn't know why we were there in his house. Had shooting pains in my right temple and behind my right eye, as well as shortness of breath and chest pain in both the master bedroom and the little girl's room.
7. What researched/historical information did you learn about this location? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Mandy: There was a "Burl" and a "Barbara" who used to own the house, as well as a "Robert". The house was built for returning WWII veterans.
8. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the haunting of this location? Note on scale: 1 represents "no haunting", 5 "moderate haunting" and 10 "extremely haunted"?
7
9. What issues does the review team need to address with the occupant (homeowner, business owner, resident)? What aspects of the investigation need to be re-addressed, retested, or clarified?
The male presence in the little girl's bedroom. Does he need to be crossed over? I did not feel comfortable with the level of possession he felt over the room/house.
10. Is there any other information that you would like to add about this investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Nope! :)
Mary:
1. What was your role in this investigation? (Please check one)
Sensitive/Psy
2. What equipment did you use on this investigation?
Thermometer IR
Electro Magnetic Field Meter (EMF meter)
3. What phenomena did you experience on this investigation? (Please check all that apply)
Temperature related phenomena (hot or cold spots)
Sensation of energy
4. In review of the footage, recording, or photographs taken at the location, which of the following did you find? (Please check all that apply)
No unusual occurrences at all
5. What technical observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Mary: There was high EMF in the master bedroom from electrical appliances such as a clock radio eminating from both nightstands. There was also high EMF readings around a light switch. The temperature stayed fairly even with small spikes. The most prominent one was from 71 degrees to 68 degrees. The boy's room in the front of the house was the warmest of the 3 bedrooms. We asked for the entity to lower the temperature if there was anyone present with us. Instead of lowering it, it spiked upward at the same time as the EMF spiked. This room was stuffy, but smaller and there were 3 investigators present. There was a slight breeze that was felt, but there was no AC?heat?fan to cause it nor was there any breeze felt by the window itself. The girl's room was significantly colder. It was a cold evening (for Florda) and we learned that this area which was part of the original structure, was not as well insulated.
6. What sensitive observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Mary: When first entering the home I felt energy immediately in the living room. Later I picked up on a young girl with blonde curls, maybe a blue ribbon, in perhaps early 20th century clothing, specifically a white, square cut neckline. An "A" name like April or Allie came to me. She seemed friendly and curious. She also appeared to be connected with an antique dresser just insde front door, standing just to the left of it. I would guess her to be about 8. Later in the investigation when we came back into that room, I was sitting on the end of the couch nearer to the bedroms when I felt a coldness sweep around my shoulders as if someone were standing behind me. It felt more like a male energy, but not threatening. There was also a feeling of stuffiness in the master bedroom when we first entered. I did not feel anything really that was paranormal at that time.
7. What researched/historical information did you learn about this location? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Mary: Looking at researched info about the house, it appears that it may have been rental property for some years prior to being purchased by the current homeowners. The house itself was built in 1953. To date there is no record of any deaths on the property nor is there any military records of known occupants/owners that have been found.
8. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the haunting of this location? Note on scale: 1 represents "no haunting", 5 "moderate haunting" and 10 "extremely haunted"?
4
9. What issues does the review team need to address with the occupant (homeowner, business owner, resident)? What aspects of the investigation need to be re-addressed, retested, or clarified?
There needs to be a more extensive EVP session held in the daughter's bedroom. Also with the high EMF eminating from both nightstands in the master bedroom, it may be that the electrical items should be relocated to see if there is a decrease in the feelings of being watched, etc.
10. Is there any other information that you would like to add about this investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Mary: I will continue to research the occupants of the house to see if we can discover who may have rented the property or which owners actually lived there.
Brandy:
1. What was your role in this investigation? (Please check one)
Investigator (general)
2. What equipment did you use on this investigation?
Thermometer
Digital camera
Film camera
Audio recording devices
Electro Magnetic Field Meter (EMF meter)
Other (please specify)
Puck, observed ghost divining rods
3. What phenomena did you experience on this investigation? (Please check all that apply)
Sensation of energy
Odd behavior of equipment
4. In review of the footage, recording, or photographs taken at the location, which of the following did you find? (Please check all that apply)
Other (please specify below)
Saw divining rods cross and uncross, the Paranormal Puck also acted strangely. Had three coherent statements
5. What technical observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Brandy: The Paranormal Puck was the most interesting for me. It did have three statements that were unusual. It was set to speak for 15 seconds and often produced the normal nonsense. Three times, however, it did something different. In the daughter's room, when asked if the entity had a message to pass on, the Puck said "mine" -- a sense of possessiveness is noted about the entity by the homeowner. It also stated only one word instead of the typical 5 or 6. When asked about the children, it said "cattle" -- and the daughter's nickname is her name plus "Moo". Lastly, in the living room it came up with "preacher watch yourself". I also saw the EMF fields fluctuate wildly for the first time since getting the device in October. Pictures: Nothing. Film: only one picture taken, undeveloped at this time. EVPs: Nothing.
6. What sensitive observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
I observed this in the bedroom: our sensitive, Beth, felt very overwhelmed by a female presence. The message was that the entity was waiting for someone, and initially responded to "son", though the homeowner in the living room, overhearing the question, asked if this was actually her "grandson". The response was positive. The sensitive felt so overwhelmed that I had to ask it to back off twice from her. Her message to pass on was that she felt pride and and love toward her grandson. We did later learn that the male homeowner discovered his deceased grandmother, but that they had shared a close bond in life.
7. What researched/historical information did you learn about this location? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
House was built in 1953. Several people who had been in there, especially in the second to front bedroom, felt uncomfortable there. This is where we had the most activity and nearly everyone agreed that it was an older male entity who was very possessive of the house. Mary and Erin did research the house and discovered that it was also a rental unit for some time.
8. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the haunting of this location? Note on scale: 1 represents "no haunting", 5 "moderate haunting" and 10 "extremely haunted"?
7
9. What issues does the review team need to address with the occupant (homeowner, business owner, resident)? What aspects of the investigation need to be re-addressed, retested, or clarified?
Would like them to try EVP again.
10. Is there any other information that you would like to add about this investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Brandy: none.
Erin:
1. What was your role in this investigation? (Please check one)
Investigator (general)
2. What equipment did you use on this investigation?
Digital camera
Other (please specify)
Ovilus
3. What phenomena did you experience on this investigation? (Please check all that apply)
Temperature related phenomena (hot or cold spots)
Sensation of energy
Sensation of being watched
4. In review of the footage, recording, or photographs taken at the location, which of the following did you find? (Please check all that apply)
Orb images (digital)
Other (please specify below)
Not sure what it is, but it appears the same color and consistancy of an orb, but they are lines that seem to form an "H" or backwards "4".
5. What technical observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Erin: I used the ovilus during the investigation, which said a lot of words, in total probably around a hundred. Of the ones I could decipher, the ones it said more than once are step, stairs, upstairs, fell through, angel, fears, property, pray, and safe. After another investigator said that they thought they had seen a shadow walk by, the ovilus said "quick". We got some EMF spikes following some of the questions we asked, such as "was this your house", "was this your room" and "are you male".
6. What sensitive observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
In the master bedroom, I felt very anxious and uncomfortable, like someone did not want us there. I felt like I was being watched from the master bathroom. I felt the sensation of being very cold, even though the temperature had not changed.
7. What researched/historical information did you learn about this location? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
I went to the county courthouse to search the prior owners of the property, and was able to get back to 1961. Prior to 1957 the indexes are a bit of a mess, and I couldn't find the original deed to to the property. But here is what I did find: The current owners bought the property in 1991 from Robert P. Andrews, Barbara A. Andrews, and Bobby R and Neida Childers. The Andrews and Childers got the property from Phyllis G. Francis, a widow, in 1976. Phyllis G. Francis originally took title with her husband Albert J. Francis in 1966, but Albert deeded his portion to Phyllis in 1973. I don't think he died, as there are documents filed with his name on them up to 1975 or 1976 and they are not probate-related. But I don't know on that one. Phyllis and Albert Francis took title from Bertha Ann Cochran in November of 1966. Bertha Ann Cochran originally took title with her husband Burl J. Cochran in 1962. Burl seems to have died in late 1965 because the estate and a deed giving Bertha the full rights to the property were filed in January of 1966. She sold the house ten months later. The Cochrans got the property from William F. Jones in 1962. I found a quitclaim deed in January of 1961 between William F. Jones and Joan C. Spond. Quitclaim deeds are generally filed between two parties that know each other, usually between family or a husband and wife. Most of the time it's because people are getting married or divorced or someone died. I don't know if this is the deed where William took title, or if Joan was taking title, or Joan could have been removed from title. I couldn't find the deed to look at it. And that's where I lost the trail.
8. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the haunting of this location? Note on scale: 1 represents "no haunting", 5 "moderate haunting" and 10 "extremely haunted"?
9
9. What issues does the review team need to address with the occupant (homeowner, business owner, resident)? What aspects of the investigation need to be re-addressed, retested, or clarified?
I think the team needs to check with her to see if the activity continues, or if it seems to have lessened. If the activity continues, further EVP sessions may be warranted, as there seemed to be a good amount of response, both technical and psychically, to the EVP questions that were asked.
10. Is there any other information that you would like to add about this investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Erin: No, I can't think of anything I haven't said. Just that this was a very active place, and I experienced a lot.
Les:
1. What was your role in this investigation? (Please check one)
Investigator (general)
2. What equipment did you use on this investigation?
Digital camera
Electro Magnetic Field Meter (EMF meter)
3. What phenomena did you experience on this investigation? (Please check all that apply)
No Response
4. In review of the footage, recording, or photographs taken at the location, which of the following did you find? (Please check all that apply)
Orb images (digital)
5. What technical observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Les The EMF meter was low throughout the home but was very actively bouncing between .5 and 1.5 most of the time. Slightly higher in the girls bedroom and master bedroom.
6. What sensitive observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Les None
7. What researched/historical information did you learn about this location? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Les I was not there for the first discussion after the first walk through and had to catch up when I returned. Some of the history of the house I knew before hand as I am related to the Homeowners
8. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the haunting of this location? Note on scale: 1 represents "no haunting", 5 "moderate haunting" and 10 "extremely haunted"?
6
9. What issues does the review team need to address with the occupant (homeowner, business owner, resident)? What aspects of the investigation need to be re-addressed, retested, or clarified?
The girls room and master bedroom and livingroom
10. Is there any other information that you would like to add about this investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Les The home seemed to be very active and I found the ghost rods pretty interesting as they responded to the questions.